Alessandro Ceppellini vs Domagoj Biljesko Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W L L W W L L
Form
L L W L W L W W L LH2H: Ceppellini 1 - 0 Biljesko
They have played 2 sets in total, with Ceppellini winning 2 and Biljesko winning 0. The last match between Ceppellini and Biljesko was at the M15 Rovinj, 20-03-2019, First, Clay with Alessandro Ceppellini getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Alessandro Ceppellini | 1 |
| Domagoj Biljesko | 0 |
M15 Rovinj(20-03-2019)
| Ceppellini | Stats | Biljesko |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | 882 |
| 873 | Highest Rank | 751 |
| 28 | Age | 27 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 47% (103-114) | Career Total W/L | 53% (210-186) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Draper VS Berrettini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Dzumhur VS Arnaldi PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Ceppellini VS Biljesko H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Alessandro Ceppellini
Player
Domagoj Biljesko
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
44%
(
22 of
50)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
11
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
49%
(
33 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
Ceppellini VS Biljesko H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 11 |
| 1:18:0 | Average Match Time | 1:18:0 |
| 65% (44/68) | 1st Serve % | 44% (22/50) |
| 57% (25/44) | 1st Serve Win % | 45% (10/22) |
| 42% (10/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 29% (8/28) |
| 100% (7/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (4/10) |
| 64% (32/50) | Return Points Win % | 49% (33/68) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Alessandro Ceppellini Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Leopold Zima
Player
Alessandro Ceppellini
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
73%
(
79 of
108)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
38 of
79)
28%
(
7 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
46%
(
32 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
57 of
108)
95
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emilien Voisin
Player
Alessandro Ceppellini
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
64%
(
27 of
42)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Alessandro Ceppellini
Player
Ivan Karlo Ban
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
71)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 2-6 7-5 10-5 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Yannik Steinegger
Player
Alessandro Ceppellini
56%
(
45 of
80)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
46%
(
37 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 4-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alessandro Ceppellini
Player
Mark Mitchell
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-7(2) 10-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 4-6 6-1 10-8 | H2H | |||
view more
Domagoj Biljesko Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Yanki Erel
Player
Domagoj Biljesko
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
46%
(
31 of
68)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
24 of
31)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jan Kupcic
Player
Domagoj Biljesko
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
49%
(
25 of
51)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Domagoj Biljesko
Player
Syl Gaxherri
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
68%
(
44 of
65)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 3-6 10-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Kevin Humpfner
Player
Domagoj Biljesko
59%
(
52 of
88)
1st Serve %
68%
(
71 of
105)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
13
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
45 of
71)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
35 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
47 of
105)
100
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 2-6 6-4 10-5 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 47% (103/114) | Win/Loss | 53% (210/186) |
| 47% (235/261) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (489/422) |
| 49% (2231/2355) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (4386/4006) |
| 29% (2/5) | Hard Win/Loss | 54% (37/32) |
| 49% (99/105) | Clay Win/Loss | 53% (161/142) |
| 33% (2/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (12/12) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 165 | Aces Total | 461 |
| 0.11 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.31 |
| 245 | Total Double Faults | 1275 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 386.4 | Average Opponent Rank | 370.65 |
| 57% (3662/6441) | 1st Serve % | 58% (8653/14873) |
| 60% (2198/3662) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (5623/8653) |
| 48% (1326/2779) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (2655/6220) |
| 44% (291/663) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (711/1594) |
| 41% (2587/6237) | Return Points Win % | 42% (6210/14751) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/8) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/3) |
| 49% (103/106) | Futures W/L | 54% (210/180) |
| 47% (101/215) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (207/390) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 51% (26/51) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (34/68) |
| 52% (32/62) | Deciding Set Win % | 42% (52/123) |
| 83% (100/83) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (208/173) |
| 17% (100/17) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (208/34) |
| 17% (117/20) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (188/35) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
